Beto O’Rourke’s energetic run for a US Senate in Texas final month has stirred absolute voices in a Democratic celebration investiture to surveillance a effusive Texas congressman as a 2020 presidential claimant who, as a party’s standard-bearer, would offer a prophesy of America resisting opposite that of Republicans.
However, a new research of congressional votes from a non-profit news organization Capital Main shows that even as O’Rourke represented one of a most solidly Democratic congressional districts in a United States, he has frequently voted opposite a infancy of House Democrats in support of Republican bills and Trump administration priorities.
Capital Main reviewed the 167 votes O’Rourke has expel in a House in antithesis to a infancy of his possess celebration during his six-year reign in Congress. Many of those votes were not on-going dissents alongside other left-leaning lawmakers, yet instead votes to assistance pass Republican-sponsored legislation.
O’Rourke has voted for GOP bills that his associate Democratic lawmakers pronounced reinforced Republicans’ anti-tax ideology, chipped divided during a Affordable Care Act (ACA), enervated Wall Street regulations, increased a hoary fuel attention and bolstered Donald Trump’s immigration policy.
Consumer, environmental, open health and polite rights organizations have expel legislation corroborated by O’Rourke as helping large banks, undermining a quarrel opposite meridian change and ancillary Trump’s anti-immigrant agenda. During a prior administration, Barack Obama’s White House released statements slamming dual GOP bills corroborated by a 46-year-old Democratic legislator.
O’Rourke’s votes for Republican legislation – that during times put him during contingency with a infancy of Texas Democratic lawmakers in Congress – underscore his membership in a New Democrat Coalition, a coterie of House Democrats many closely aligned with business interests.
O’Rourke did not respond to questions from Capital Main about his votes.
O’Rourke was one of a series of younger Democratic possibilities who ran suddenly clever campaigns in traditionally Republican states in a 2018 midterm elections. His speeches, grassroots fundraising and rejecting of corporate PAC income helped his discuss build a clever online following among activists who were anticipating a choosing would outcome in a Democratic parliament majority.
In new weeks, a probability of an O’Rourke presidential candidacy has been increased by former Obama aides and fundraisers, as good as by Third Way – a finance-industry funded thinktank that formerly done headlines deriding Democratic senator Elizabeth Warren. He has also been lauded by former Hillary Clinton assistance Neera Tanden of a Center for American Progress, a Democratic thinktank whose officials recently slammed Republican tax and immigration legislation that O’Rourke voted for. Much of a celebration elite’s support for an O’Rourke candidacy has not mentioned his routine record or agenda.
In a final dual years, O’Rourke was among a top fifth of all lawmakers voting opposite his possess party’s positions. FiveThirtyEight has calculated that in that same time period, O’Rourke has voted for a Trump administration position roughly 30% of a time. The website pronounced that is above what analysts envision would come from a management representing a district as Democratic as O’Rourke’s. For comparison, O’Rourke’s congressional district votes some-more Democratic than than many districts in Massachusetts, according to a Cook Political Report.
Each opinion reviewed next was one in that O’Rourke pennyless from a infancy of legislators in his possess party.
Since a creation in 2010, a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has been underneath relentless attack by Republicans, who have sought to assistance a financial attention extent a authority. At times, they have found an fan in O’Rourke.
Republicans in 2015 introduced legislation to dissolution that directive. Civil rights groups such as a NAACP opposite a GOP magnitude and House Democrats said it was designed to hindrance “recent actions to base out discriminatory practices among automobile lenders”. The Obama White House said it strongly opposite a Republican bill.
O’Rourke nonetheless strictly co-sponsored a bill and voted for it. Echoing a GOP’s line of attack on a CFPB, a Democrat faulted a organisation for a “lack of openness”, that he asserted had combined “uncertainty, critique of a CFPB’s conclusions, and has done loans some-more costly to borrowers”. While O’Rourke after voted against regulating a Congressional Review Act to kill a CFPB’s regulation, a strange check he voted for set a theatre for a GOP to repeal it underneath Trump.
Also in 2015, O’Rourke voted for a Republican check that Democrats said would break lending avowal protections for home debt borrowers. The Obama administration agreed, arising a veto threat dogmatic that a GOP check directed to “unnecessarily check doing of vicious consumer protections designed to exterminate ambiguous lending practices that minister to unsure mortgages, harm homeowners by stealing a private right of movement for violations, and undercut a nation’s financial stability”.
The check upheld with a support of O’Rourke, who said: “I trust it is a practical, short-term concede that will yield long-term advantages to consumers in a United States.” He argued that a GOP legislation would concede regulators to “continue operative with banks to safeguard that they are prepared to entirely approve with a law” and “ensure that “consumers requesting for home mortgages are given all a information they need”.
Fossil fuels and energy
During his Senate race, O’Rourke was lauded for his rhetoric about a hazard of meridian change. In Congress, he has questioned a reserve of healthy gas fracking, and he has high ratings from a League of Conservation Voters.
O’Rourke, however, has also expel pivotal votes with Republicans to boost a hoary fuel attention whose CO emissions are during a base of a meridian crisis.
For instance, O’Rourke was one of usually a handful of House Democrats who voted for Republican bills to lift a 40-year-old oil trade ban.
During a legislative discuss over lifting a ban, a Democrats’ cabinet news argued that “the impassioned proceed taken by this check not usually repeals stream wanton trade restrictions, yet also ensures that no trade restrictions – for any reason – could be implemented or enforced in a future”. The Democratic news combined that “the check could have potentially immeasurable consequences for consumers, a sourroundings and meridian change”.
He also upheld GOP legislation that Democrats pronounced was assembled to strengthen a application industry. Republicans said a magnitude was designed “to safeguard arguable electricity use and revoke a risk of fires and glow hazards caused by unsound foliage management” in areas where energy lines cranky sovereign lands. Repeating charges done by Democrats in a bill’s committee report, Arizona Democratic deputy Raúl Grijalva said during a building debate: “The check waives guilt for companies that start timberland fires or means other damage. This is nonsense and shifts an implausible weight and risk onto American taxpayers.”
O’Rourke was one of 69 Democrats to support a bill, that passed.
Immigration and rapist justice
In representing a limit city of El Paso, O’Rourke has been an outspoken disciple for immigration reform. His Senate discuss website said he wants to “pass a Dream Act and safeguard that undocumented immigrants who were brought here as children, known as Dreamers, find a permanent home and citizenship in a US.” It also announced that he wants to “end a militarization of a immigration coercion system”. O’Rourke this month done headlines slamming a Trump administration’s immigration policy.
However, he was one of a organisation of Democrats who pennyless celebration ranks to support Republican legislation to relinquish mandate for Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents and pursuit field to take polygraph tests – a offer that was partial of a Trump administration’s plan to arrange a deportation force.
A 2012 Government Accountability Office report remarkable that CBP uses polygraph tests as partial of practice credentials checks “to lessen a risk of worker crime and misconduct” and endorsed a organisation cruise expanding a tests.
In Apr of 2017, a Trump administration released a memo pulling for management to relinquish a polygraph tests in sequence to assist a employing of thousands of new CBP agents. Critics immediately lifted red flags – a American Immigration Lawyers Association pronounced it was a devise “to H2O down employing standards”. Tom Jawetz, a Center for American Progress’ vice-president for immigration, told Univision that “many agents brought on previously who had not left by a polygraph were auxiliary with cartels and theme to corruption”. James Tomsheck, a CBP’s former conduct of inner affairs, called a thought of waivers “preposterous” in light of what a polygraph tests had been finding.
Two days after a Trump administration’s memo, Republicans led by immigration hardliner Representative Martha McSally of Arizona introduced legislation to concede a polygraph tests to be waived. Democrats adamantly objected.
New Mexico Democratic deputy Michelle Lujan Grisham, president of a Congressional Hispanic Caucus, said: “Eliminating a vicious polygraph mandate for certain CBP field usually undermines a nation’s safety, given this agency’s ancestral tie to orderly crime, drug cartels, and corruption.” She asserted that “no other sovereign law coercion organisation in a nation – not a FBI, DEA, ATF or Secret Service – creates any exceptions to their polygraph exam”.
Democratic congressman Luis Gutierrez, announced that: “Anyone who votes for this check is voting to support and exercise Donald Trump’s views on immigration, his enterprise to militarize a southern border, and his anticipation of a mass deportation force.”
O’Rourke opted to join Republicans in voting for a bill, that passed. He said a magnitude was required to “help speed adult a employing routine and yield a CBP Commissioner additional authorities to partisan and sinecure peculiarity CBP officers and limit unit agents”.
During a same two-month stretch, O’Rourke also pennyless ranks from his celebration in ancillary GOP legislation that, according to GovTrack, would “add a murdering or attempted murdering [of] a law coercion officer to a list of aggravating factors in sovereign genocide chastisement cases”.
The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights said a check was “an nonessential and misled try to politicize a hapless deaths of law coercion officers and could eventually intensify existent tragedy between law coercion and a communities they serve, generally African Americans”.
Democratic deputy Jerry Nadler of New York argued that it would change a elemental threshold for collateral punishment by “impos[ing] a genocide chastisement for attempted murder”.
O’Rourke was one of 48 Democrats to join Republicans in ancillary a legislation, that passed.
Regulating Wall Street
O’Rourke has a somewhat mixed record on financial issues, according to a watchdog organisation Americans for Financial Reform (AFR). At times he has voted with Democrats to strengthen existent regulations. Still, he has also frequently aided a GOP in some of a efforts to deregulate Wall Street.
For instance, in 2014 and 2018 O’Rourke expel votes for GOP bills that enclosed supplies weakening a supposed Volcker Rule, that aims to forestall financial firms from regulating depositors’ assets for their possess suppositional trading.
In 2017 and 2018, O’Rourke also voted for:
And a Republican bill that Democrats pronounced would “eliminate meaningful, transparent disclosures to consumers about their remoteness rights, including their ability to opt-out from carrying their information sole to eccentric third celebration companies”.
O’Rourke has been a supporter of improving Obamacare, expanding Medicaid and adding a open choice to contest with private insurance. At times, though, he pennyless with a infancy of House Democrats to assistance Republicans try to chip divided during a medical law, and in one instance, he corroborated a GOP check Democrats pronounced was designed to column adult a Trump administration’s attempts to reinstate Obamacare.
The ACA determined a eccentric remuneration advisory residence to suggest ways to revoke Medicare spending. According to a inactive Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a denunciation formulating a residence prohibited it from proposing rationing, reduced benefits, aloft premiums or limited eligibility.
Despite those safeguards, Republicans led by former vice-presidential hopeful Sarah Palin shortly forked to a residence as explanation that Democrats were aiming to emanate “death panels”. As that mythology spread throughout regressive media, Republicans in 2015 and 2017 brought adult legislation to stoke those fears and discharge a board. O’Rourke defied his celebration and twice voted with Republicans to kill a board. He also strictly co-sponsored both measures.
Additionally, when Republicans were pulling to reinstate a ACA with Trump’s American Health Care Act (AHCA), O’Rourke voted for Republican legislation to yield special taxation credits for Cobra advantages – an beginning that Democratic deputy Richard Neal of Massachusetts said was “simply a backdoor approach for states to distinguish opposite existent conditions”.
But that was not a finish of a story. Within months, Republicans began dire a new package of taxation cuts that Democratic groups such as a Center for American Progress deemed a “tax fraud 2”. One square of that package was a proposal that a vicious Los Angeles Times editorial pronounced “would carve out a new taxation preserve for start-up businesses”. The Center for American Progress singled out those supplies as one of a disgusting aspects of a taxation package.
As Democrats sought to benefaction a one front opposite a new GOP taxation cuts, O’Rourke pennyless ranks with House Democrats – and many of a Texas Democratic delegation – to vote for a GOP legislation. He upheld a initiative, even yet a Congressional Budget Office warned that a check would enhance a deficit.