Home / Politics / God and politics (continued)

God and politics (continued)

LOUISVILLE — Religion and politics are again during a forefront of this year’s presidential race. Yet, in this campaign, self-described evangelicals don’t seem as endangered as they once were about a candidate’s personal faith. Otherwise, some-more of them competence support a plainly Christian candidate, Sen. Ted Cruz, rather than Donald Trump, whose laxity with a Bible, not to discuss a lifestyle it recommends, places him among biblical illiterates.

At a Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, we participated in a forum called “God and Politics,” along with SBTS boss R. Albert Mohler Jr. The forum was packed. It was also civil, deferential and non-confrontational and many in assemblage wished it could be a norm.

Mr. Mohler remarkable that “God and Politics” wasn’t meant to be “either/or,” and he was right. Christians have a freedom, he said, even a obligation, to pronounce to caring and enlightenment from a biblical viewpoint. Right again, though my categorical indicate was that in an increasingly physical society, regressive Christians contingency find a improved approach to make their summary heard, if they wish to prevail, generally on amicable issues. To quote a biblical passage they should be “wise as serpents, though submissive as doves.”

The problem confronting regressive Christians currently is suggested in investigate conducted by a Barna Group, a heading investigate classification focused on a intersection of faith and culture. In a consult published in Aug 2015, Barna found that: “While a United States stays made by Christianity, a faith’s change — quite as a force in American politics and enlightenment — is solemnly waning. An augmenting series of religiously unaffiliated, a solid dump in church attendance, a new Supreme Court preference on same-sex marriage, and a flourishing tragedy over eremite freedoms all indicate to a incomparable secularizing trend unconditional opposite a nation.”