Home / Spotlight / ‘Nipplegate’ revisited: What unequivocally happened between Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake?

‘Nipplegate’ revisited: What unequivocally happened between Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake?

CLOSE

SportsPulse: With Justin Timberlake set to make his lapse to a large diversion for a initial time given Super Bowl XXXVIII, USA TODAY’s Josh Peter looks behind during how ‘Nipplegate’ unfolded, and if we can design a quip from Janet Jackson, too.
USA TODAY Sports

MINNEAPOLIS — Justin Timberlake is headed here to perform during a Super Bowl halftime uncover on Sunday, stirring speak and fueling questions about one of a many shameful moments in a story of a NFL’s annual spectacle.

It was Timberlake, after all, who along with Janet Jackson during a 2004 Super Bowl halftime uncover gave birth to a word “wardrobe malfunction’’ and together were inextricable in “Nipplegate.’’

As a barbarous halftime uncover culminated, Timberlake pulled off partial of Jackson’s outfit, quickly exposing her right breast in front of a TV assembly of 140 million viewers, many left wondering about what had usually happened.

“Let me ask we this,’’ Trevor Reilly, a linebacker for a New England Patriots, pronounced this week, “was that whole thing designed or not? What’s a consensus?’’

Jackson isn’t articulate about it. “No comment,’’ her publicist Paula Witt pronounced in an email to USA TODAY Sports.

Timberlake has pronounced small other than that he’s contemptible for what happened.

More: Super Bowl LII players wish Justin Timberlake, Janet Jackson to reunite for halftime show

More: Beyond a stars: Patriots’ Super Bowl stories extend to benchwarmers and practice-squad players

More: Kirk Cousins alighting spots: Seven likeliest teams for QB after Redskins’ Alex Smith trade

So USA TODAY Sports wanted down the key players: an Ecuadoran tailor, a physique piercer, a former NFL executive, a TV writer and a former management of a Federal Communications Commission (FCC), that was tasked with removing to a bottom of an occurrence that has football players like Reilly wondering about a halftime uncover that will perpetually couple Jackson and Timberlake.

“She asked him to do that, lift (her) shirt off? ’’ Reilly said. “And because did he determine to it?’’

Best to start with a Ecuadoran tailor.

Marcello Garzon, a tailor

Garzon, 66, speaks with a thick Ecuadoran accent. But during a phone talk with USA TODAY Sports final week, he done himself clear: Jackson asked him to change a leather outfit she brought to Houston to wear during a halftime show.

“Tell me true what we need from me,’’ Garzon said.

Details are needed. Details about a alteration, and anything else Garzon knows about a halftime uncover scandal.

“No, sir. That’s confidential,’’ he replied. “That’s unequivocally confidential. How do we contend that? we sealed a papers with Mrs. Jackson to not recover anything during all.’’

 He was asked to pointer a confidentiality agreement before he altered a garment?

“Yes, sir,’’ Garzon said.

But he did, indeed, accommodate Jackson a week of a Super Bowl?

“Of course, we met her,’’ Garzon sniffed.

The hunt continued.

Jim Steeg, a NFL executive

Steeg, afterwards a NFL’s indicate chairman for a halftime show, pronounced he was in the league’s management counter at Reliant Stadium (now NRG Stadium) when Jackson and Timberlake were on a stage. But he pronounced he was dreaming when Mike Pereira, afterwards clamp boss for officiating for a NFL, incited to him.

“Pereira pronounced to me, ‘Hey, did we usually see what happened?’ ” Steeg recalled. “I said, ‘No.’ Then he played it behind on a TiVo that we were regulating for present replay.’’

The picture of Jackson’s unprotected right breast stared behind during him.

Steeg pronounced he immediately called Salli Frattini, afterwards a writer for MTV, that was producing the halftime show.

“You could hear in a (MTV production) lorry they were all kind of giving any other high fives and celebrating a fact a uncover was over and they did a good job,’’ pronounced Steeg. “It didn’t take though a notation or so when Salli called behind and …’’

The picture of Jackson’s unprotected right breast stared behind during Frattini.

The jubilee in a MTV lorry was over. The repairs control was underway. Frattini hustled to a NFL management room, according to Steeg.

“I was dissapoint and I’m still dissapoint about it,’’ pronounced Steeg, who has been credited with branch a NFL’s halftime uncover into an spectacular during his 35-year career with a league. 

“The thing that worried me a many about it is we didn’t consider a establishment was respected,’’ he added. “I suspicion a Super Bowl was kind of a apex for everybody, and we didn’t consider it was reputable as an institution.’’

Salli Frattini, a producer

Frattini, a initial lady to furnish a Super Bowl halftime show, final week heaped regard on Timberlake — though not on Jackson — when asked about “Nipplegate.”

“I trust he kind of manned adult and talked about it all and I’m not certain she unequivocally did, we know?’’ Frattini said. “I’m blissful his career has continued to flourish. I’m still a believer and we have no regrets and negligence for Justin.’’

And Jackson?

“I don’t trust she rubbed a conditions as good as he did,’’ Frattini said. “I’m still not utterly certain because anybody suspicion that (nudity) would be a good thought to do in a initial place. 

“If somebody could get me a answer to that, that would be a golden prize.’’

During a Thursday rehearsal, Frattini said, a prolongation group experimented with Timberlake pulling off Jackson’s dress though involving nudity. The exhibit was choreographed to take place as a strain Rock Your Body lyrics culminated with Timberlake singing “gonna have we unprotected by a finish of this song.”

Frattini pronounced a thought was nixed though refused to contend why. She also pronounced she is assured a thought that led to Jackson’s breast being unprotected came from Jackson or Jackson’s stylist and was presented to Timberlake in Jackson’s sauce room.

“There was a assembly right before to a halftime (show),’’ Frattini said. “The thought was pitched to Justin. Janet’s stylist or whoever else was in a room. (Timberlake) went along with it and a mistake happened.

“There wasn’t ostensible to be any reveal. There should not even have been an movement impulse or anything ever ripped off her body.’’

That stays is open for debate.

Byriah Dailey, a physique piercer

Dailey pronounced it was Super Bowl week when Wayne Scot Lukas walked into Taurian Piercing and Metal Shop in Houston. Lukas, according to Dailey, identified himself as Jackson’s stylist and pronounced he was looking for pap valuables for Jackson.

Lukas staid on a sunburst pap defense Jackson wore during a halftime show, according to Dailey.

“At a finish of it, while we were talking, he was like, ‘OK, watch a halftime show. There’s going to be a warn during a end.’ ” pronounced Dailey, who keeps a laminated duplicate of a People magazine story that documented his purpose in a scandal.

Dailey pronounced he still has a second sunburst pap shield.

“I had a span of them,’’ Dailey said. “I still have a other one, trust it or not. They usually purchased one. … we was kind of happy to get absolved of it.”

Nonetheless, he was never contacted during one of a many high-profile investigations ever launched by a FCC.

Michael Powell, a FCC chairman

Michael Powell pronounced he still remembers sitting subsequent to one of his neighbors during a Super Bowl watch celebration in 2004 during a halftime show.

“And we said, ‘Oh, my God. If this unequivocally happened, my day is really going to siphon tomorrow,’ ’’ Powell told USA TODAY Sports. “And we went home and we had a TiVo and we did what everybody did.’’

Meaning, he watched a replay and froze a footage, confirming Jackson’s right breast had been exposed, notwithstanding for reduction than a second.

“And we incited to my mother and we said, ‘Oh, yeah, my day is unequivocally going to siphon tomorrow.’ And it did,’’ Powell said.

“The fight was on a notation we walked into a office. People were descending all over themselves to announce their snub and their discontent.”

Powell pronounced a initial call he got was from Paul Tagliabue, afterwards a NFL’s commissioner.

“Insisting (the NFL) had zero to do with this,’’ Powell said.

Shortly thereafter, Powell said, came a call from CBS, that had promote a Super Bowl. An executive insisted CBS knew zero in allege about what happened, according to Powell, who pronounced a FCC perceived a inundate of calls from indignant TV viewers.

“It was as if somebody had come into your church and took their garments off while we were sitting there on Sunday morning,’’ he said.

So Powell systematic a investigation.

Video was reviewed. Interviews were conducted. Facts were collected.

“There was a lot of baying for blood,’’ pronounced Powell, now boss of a National Cable Telecommunications Association, “and we unequivocally wanted that to be destined divided from Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson as artists and some-more to where we unequivocally had office most, that was a management of those who were broadcasting and producing a show.’’

Eventually, a FCC levied a $550,000 excellent opposite CBS. But a courts overturned it, statute networks had been given deficient notice of what constituted indecency.

As Super Bowl LII approached this week, Powell found himself seeking questions identical to those lobbed during USA TODAY Sports by a Patriots linebacker Trevor Reilly and Philadelphia Eagles linebacker Kamu Grugler-Hill.

“What unequivocally happened with that?’’ Grugler-Hill asked.

More than a FCC could prove, according to Powell, who estimated he testified about a matter on Capitol Hill for a sum of 9 hours.

“To this day, notwithstanding some ambiguity about who knew what, we consider we were comparatively assured that somehow those producing a uncover knew what was going to happen,’’ he said. “Their story to this day was that they had positively no thought on how a artists usually did this adult on their own.

“That’s plausible, though didn’t seem to us where a justification pointed.’’

InterNations.org