Home / Politics / Week In Politics: House Intel Committee, GOP Health Care Bill

Week In Politics: House Intel Committee, GOP Health Care Bill


I’m Audie Cornish in Washington where Republicans were not means to convene adequate of their possess members to opinion for a deputy to a Affordable Care Act or Obamacare.

Joining me in a studio to speak about this and all else and what is arguably a many material trickle of a Trump administration so far, Kimberly Atkins, a arch Washington contributor and columnist during a Boston Herald. Welcome, Kimberly.

KIMBERLY ATKINS: Thanks for carrying me.

CORNISH: And Guy Benson, a domestic editor of Townhall.com, acquire to a studio.

GUY BENSON: Thanks for carrying me.

CORNISH: OK, and to your Twitter feeds since Kimberly yours usually has like an emoticon in a shrugging suit (laughter) in terms of what we make of what happened. And, Guy, yours says, check injured – routine incited even worse. So, Kimberly, let me start with we since what usually happened here?

ATKINS: we mean, that’s radically what it is. We had House Speaker Ryan observant radically this is what it’s like to order when we have a majority. So if this is what it’s like when a infancy is in power, it bodes flattering badly for a new Trump administration.

A pivotal debate guarantee couldn’t get off a ground. And this is a same House that voted 60-some peculiar times to dissolution Obamacare during a Obama administration when there was unequivocally a mystic vote, and there was no – zero to be finished after that. But once they had a charge of unequivocally doing something about Obamacare, they couldn’t come adult with adequate accord to make it happen.

CORNISH: Now, Guy Benson, we remember during a coronation period, Paul Ryan was vocalization rapturously about one government. we had never listened a word so lovingly deployed (laughter). But what did we see in how this went down?

BENSON: Well, a Republicans came to electorate in 2010, and they pronounced we don’t like Obamacare. It’s not a good policy. You need to elect us to win. And a Republicans won a House. And they said, it’s not enough. We also need a Senate. And electorate said, OK, here’s a Senate. And they said, well, we still need that President who will pointer repeal. And afterwards Donald Trump was elected.

And here we are currently – one government, 7 years of promises, 3 inhabitant elections won – and we had Paul Ryan of all people observant that Obamacare will be a law of a land for a foreseeable future. That is a distinguished – I’m certain that was a unequivocally formidable judgment for him to contend out loud.

But we consider that it seems to be loyal since a lot of my associate conservatives are saying, well, let’s start over. And that’s an appealing-sounding thing. But step one is, OK, start over. Step 3 is dissolution and replace. But what is step two? Because we usually had a real…

CORNISH: But we had a lot of time to consider about this, right?

BENSON: Seven years.

CORNISH: we consider I’m a small astounded in a news currently to hear that people saying, well, we’re done. Let’s pierce on. we mean, did we see that entrance even if it unsuccessful that they would usually say, well, let’s kind of take on other things – infrastructure…

BENSON: Well, we don’t – there’s a few points on that. we don’t consider that that’s what Paul Ryan believes. we don’t consider that’s what arrange and record Republicans trust in a House or in a Senate. we do consternation if that’s what President Trump believes.

It seems like he’s been unequivocally undone by a routine and wants to pierce on to other priorities, though there are dual problems with that. First, a stream law is still collapsing underneath a possess weight and spiteful a lot of people. And secondly, a other priorities for this president, generally taxation reform, they’re not going to get any easier now that this thing went down.

CORNISH: we wish to let Kimberly burst in, in part, since we know that it’s – while a articulate indicate has been that it’s collapsing, series one, we’ll see – right? – if it’s about to stand. And it is still operative for many tools of a country.

Kimberly, what’s your comment here of, like, how they pierce on to a rest of a bulletin and has this been – has – is there going to be genuine ramifications for how this went down?

ATKINS: Well, we consider it does demeanour – we consider a boss wants to pierce on since he’s a man who wants to cut deals and get victories. And he’s not liking, I’m sure, a fact that this was a vital defeat. He wants to change a theme as fast as possible.

Well, what we consider is function to Republicans right now is that they are traffic with a problem between a debate guarantee of repealing and fixation Obamacare and a existence as told by a Congressional Budget Office and others that say, yes, there are problems with Obamacare, though this devise won’t repair them.

And a some-more Americans listened about this plan, a reduction renouned it became adult to a indicate where, this week, a check indicated that usually 17 percent of Americans were behind it. And so Republicans had a unequivocally tough time going to opinion in preference of something that their possess voters were, we know, losing support for amid reports that millions would remove their health caring and costs would still go up…

CORNISH: Guy, it looks like we wish to burst in.

BENSON: Well, including – a antithesis enclosed a lot of conservatives. So we had a mainstream Republican Party in Congress fighting a Democrats, that were one – they were totally one opposite this – though also a lot of their possess bloc from a core right, quite a tough right, saying, no, this is not going to repair a lot of a unequivocally genuine problems with Obamacare. We don’t consider that it’s going to make it better, and afterwards all of this disaster is going to be on us.

CORNISH: Can we ask a small some-more about that since we had Nancy Pelosi, we know, kind of arms crossed yesterday smiling into a camera observant rookie mistake, like, picking a date opinion though carrying a support.

And lots of people have looked during a House Freedom Caucus, a tough line conservatives, that have been articulate with a White House about this and saying, they’ve been observant no for so long, they don’t know how to contend yes. What’s your comment as we speak to other conservatives about this?

BENSON: we consider there’s some consequence to that. we consider there are some people who don’t wish to take approbation for an answer. But we would counsel a few things. There are unequivocally intelligent health caring wonks on a right who were deeply vicious of this check observant that it unequivocally was essentially injured from a routine perspective.

And it wasn’t usually a Freedom Caucus that was a problem. To me, when it came opposite my Twitter feed a few hours ago that Barbara Comstock from Northern Virginia, a core right moderate-ish member, was going to opinion no, that was a genocide knell.

CORNISH: we see we nodding, Kimberly, we guys determine on this sold (laughter) point.

ATKINS: we consider on that indicate it does. And we consider it indicates that this is going to be, perhaps, worse than a boss suspicion to understanding with his possess celebration in Congress. We’re saying a lot of a same problems that happened underneath Speaker Boehner when we had that conflict that unequivocally finished it formidable for Republicans to oversee even when they had power.

CORNISH: You know, we wish to pierce on to another subject that we think, like, in any other week would’ve been large news, that is, like, acknowledgment hearings for Supreme Court nominee.

BENSON: Oh, right.

CORNISH: Let’s speak about that. Went for mixed days though during this point, we have a personality of a Senate Democrats, Chuck Schumer, job for a filibuster of Neil Gorsuch. And a lot of people had said, Kimberly, like, they didn’t wish to, we know, use all their ammunition or powder or whatever a Washington phrases are on, like, a initial hopeful in box there was, for some reason, some other opening on a Supreme Court. What do we make of this pierce from Schumer?

ATKINS: Look, we consider Democrats right now comprehend that this is a pierce that’s substantially going to have to be finished earlier or later, so since not do it now and harmonize their support among their members to pull behind opposite Donald Trump?

This is a hopeful that they don’t like. Yes, it won’t change a court. A regressive will be replacing a regressive in a late Antonin Scalia. But he’s – though during this point, Donald Trump will expected get during slightest one some-more pick. And they’re going to have to filibuster possibly now or after and force that arch option.

CORNISH: Guy Benson, discerning sign that people will be conference a word arch choice many times over a subsequent integrate of weeks if this becomes an emanate since Senate Republicans will have to decide, OK, do we change a manners since we don’t wish obstruction?

BENSON: Yes. And we consider that a fashion has been set by Harry Reid, a prior Democratic leader, that this is something that can be finished and has been done.

CORNISH: Right. He altered a manners in 2013.

BENSON: He did to advantage President Obama’s nominees. we would indicate out that President Obama and President Clinton any got dual non-filibustered Supreme Court picks in their initial terms. And we consider Republicans are prepared to follow a Reid rule, a Reid fashion if Democrats filibuster possibly Neil Gorsuch, who is uncommonly qualified, or whomever competence come subsequent potentially as early as this summer according to certain reports and rumors.

CORNISH: Guy Benson is a domestic editor of Townhall.com. Thank we for entrance in.

BENSON: Appreciate it.

CORNISH: And Kimberly Atkins, arch Washington contributor and columnist during a Boston Herald, interjection so much.

ATKINS: Happy to join you.


Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit a website terms of use and permissions pages during www.npr.org for serve information.

NPR transcripts are combined on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and constructed regulating a exclusive transcription routine grown with NPR. This content might not be in a final form and might be updated or revised in a future. Accuracy and accessibility might vary. The lawful record of NPR’s programming is a audio record.

Article source: http://www.npr.org/2017/03/24/521414736/week-in-politics-house-intel-committee-gop-health-care-bill