Home / Politics / When we provide politics as entertainment, we get Sean Spicer during a Emmys

When we provide politics as entertainment, we get Sean Spicer during a Emmys


Sean Spicer speaks during a Emmys on Sept. 17 during a Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles. (Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP)

Former White House press secretary Sean Spicer done a warn coming during a Emmys final night, yukking it adult with a fun about throng sizes. It was a curtsy to one of his initial appearances behind a White House podium, where he insisted, contrary to all evidence, that President Trump had drawn “the largest assembly to ever declare an coronation — duration — both in chairman and around a globe.”

The Emmys coming was only a latest stop on Spicer’s post-White House reconstruction tour, that has also included an appearance on “Jimmy Kimmel Live” and a plum appointment to Harvard’s Institute of Politics as a visiting fellow. Many observers are appalled during a “normalization” of a domestic operative who repeatedly spun vast falsehoods from a White House podium.

Spicer’s winking Emmy coming suggested he wasn’t only swelling falsehoods about throng sizes and other topics, but that he knew full good they were feign during a time he widespread them — a use some-more ordinarily famous as “lying.”

London School of Economics associate Brian Klaas summed it adult as succinctly as anyone: “The diagnosis of Spicer is another relapse of domestic norms,” he wrote on Twitter. “If we only fun about and prerogative people who distortion in government, some-more will.”

But a issues during interest here are bigger than Sean Spicer, and bigger even than the normalization of function that just a few years ago fell way outside of norms.

Spicer’s Emmys appearance also underscored how, for many Americans, politics has turn simply another form of entertainment. It’s a play that plays out essentially on radio with a rotating expel of colorful characters. As with any well-made drama, we hold clever opinions about a players and caring deeply about a outcome. But many viewers appear to trust that what transpires during a White House podium has no some-more impact on their real-world lives than what happens on “House of Cards.”

People who investigate media and politics have been sounding a alarm on this for decades. More than 30 years ago, Neil Postman of New York University warned that politics and other “serious” topics had been “transformed into good-natured adjuncts of uncover business,” a outcome of a rising prevalence of radio “devoted wholly to provision a assembly with entertainment.”

As Postman wrote in his book “Amusing Ourselves to Death”:

Entertainment is a supra-ideology of all sermon on television. No matter what is decorated or from what indicate of view, a overarching hypothesis is that it is there for a party and pleasure. That is given even on news shows that yield us daily with fragments of tragedy and barbarism, we are urged by a newscasters to ‘join them tomorrow’ …

We accept a newscasters’ invitation given we know that a ‘news’ is not to be taken seriously, that it is all in fun, so to say. Everything about a news uncover tells us this — a good looks and charity of a cast, their pleasing banter, a sparkling song that opens and closes a show, a clear film footage, a appealing commercials — all these and some-more advise that what we have only seen is no means for weeping. A news show, to put it plainly, is a format for entertainment, not for education, thoughtfulness or catharsis.

Postman upheld divided in 2003, though progressing this year his son Andrew Postman wrote for a Guardian that his father had essentially likely a arise of Trump, who has been called a nation’s “first existence TV president” — consider of a staff drama, a cliffhangers, a social media feuds, a obsessions with looks and ratings.

Trump didn’t invent all of this, of march — a politics have been headed in this instruction for decades, given during slightest a first televised presidential debates between JFK and Richard Nixon. As Ronald Reagan noted 6 years later, “politics is only like uncover business.”

Today that’s some-more loyal than ever. For a infancy of Americans, television stays a accepted source of news. Social media, blurring a lines between genuine news, feign news and entertainment, is becoming a arch information source as well. The democratizing outcome of Facebook’s news feed means that hard-hitting inquisitive broadcasting is put on equal balance with luminary report and doomsday prophecies.

Cable news, meanwhile, is on a approach to a ensign year as Trump’s pell-mell White House drives ratings upward. Sean Spicer’s fact-challenged press briefings became “must-watch” TV.

“Many of us have been assured that we are all participants in this existence show,” pronounced Karen Tongson, a cocktail enlightenment consultant during a University of Southern California. “The levity of that experience makes it easy to provide these domestic players as actors or personalities.”

If a standard American ran into Kevin Spacey on a street, for instance, she wouldn’t call a military given Frank Underwood murdered Zoe Barnes in Season 2 of “House of Cards.” We know that Spacey was personification a role, and as TV-watchers we adore a villains only as most as a heroes.

Similarly, when Spicer showed adult in a Emmys’ run after a uncover he wasn’t shunned for purveying falsehoods — he was mobbed with smiling fans. He wasn’t Sean Spicer, former White House press secretary — only a man who played him on TV.

“We’re totally bamboozled,” Tongson said. “We consider everybody’s putting on a show. And we forget a uncover indeed has real consequences.”

Article source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/09/18/when-you-treat-politics-as-entertainment-you-get-sean-spicer-at-the-emmys/

InterNations.org