Home / Ukraine / Canada’s ‘Victims of Communism’ Debacle (Op-Ed)

Canada’s ‘Victims of Communism’ Debacle (Op-Ed)

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has been changing Canada’s common self-image. He has emphasized violent, rather than pacific episodes, in the country’s history, and had a war commemorative reinstate artistic and literary images on the $20 bill. Now his supervision wants to leave an even some-more durable snippet of its rule: a monument “to the victims of Communism.”

This petrify structure is to be erected subsequent to the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa. The project has drawn many critique for poor artistic taste, inapt plcae and the cost of rededicating the space that was creatively allocated for federal legal institutions. The media has also beheld the project’s narrow-minded nature: it promotes Harper’s Conservative celebration among electorate of Eastern European origin, whose numbers in Canada are significant.

But this plan also raises the issue of collective memory, that he is perplexing to mould as partial of the radical mutation of Canadian society, followed with conspicuous ideological coherence ever given presumption energy in 2006.

The name of the relic is borrowed from the wording of the Cold War. Communism has so distant been a vision, a goal, an aspired-to eager destiny rather than an established reality. No government, possibly in Moscow, Beijing or Budapest, ever admitted the victory of Communism. Ironically, it is among Cold War warriors that the term came to denote a political existence to be decried and denounced. To invoke Communism 25 years after the end of the Cold War fits in with the aggressively self-righteous tongue standard of the Harper government.

Collaborators or Patriots?

In the 1930s and 1940s, nazi groups were common in Europe, any hailing the supremacy of an racial group, a race or a nation. Not surprisingly, during the Nazi function of Europe they took partial in massacres and other brutalities. As racial nationalism has regained inflection in recent years, several Eastern European governments are perplexing to present these same people as patriots and heroes. Today, one can find monuments opposite Eastern Europe, that honour these Nazi collaborators, including SS members, as “fighters opposite Communism.”

To do so one needs to affirm a moral equilibrium between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. An example of such an effort is a Museum of Occupations in Estonia, that initial announced autonomy from Russia in February 1918, the very impulse German infantry landed on its territory.

The museum, that ignores that foundational occupation, focuses on Nazi troops function (1941-1944) and nearly half a century of Soviet Estonia (1940-1941 and 1944-1991). The country is portrayed as a victim, even yet the Estonian Nazi collaborators committed mass massacres of Jews, creation Estonia one of the initial to earn from Berlin the title of jüdenrein (free of Jews) and Estonians actively participated in the using of their commonwealth during the Soviet period.

The museum, that one enters between the images of a red star and a swastika, conveys the idea that Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union are radically one and the same.

More Than History

By trying to downplay the significance of the Soviet onslaught opposite Nazism, the Harper supervision is following a trend common in countries of Eastern and Central Europe. He is redesigning the collective memory of World War II and reinforcing feeling toward Russia.

Harper has been by far the most provocative among leaders of major countries with honour to Russia and its president. Unlike Chinese boss Xi Jinping who took partial in Victory Day celebrations on Red Square, or German Chancellor Angela Merkel who went to Moscow to honour Soviet soldiers killed fighting her country, Harper neglected the occasion, so assisting erase from our common memory the decisive purpose of the Soviet army, that fought the Nazis alone for nearly 3 years before Western allies finally landed in Normandy in June 1944.

While the war brought wealth to North America, the Soviets paid the heaviest cost for the victory, with 27 million killed and much of its industrial infrastructure destroyed.

Harper ardently supports racial nationalism, frequently anti-Russian, in Eastern Europe. His supervision authorised the Canadian Embassy in Kiev to become a safe breakwater for those holding partial in the Euromaidan protests in Ukraine in the winter of 2014. Defense Minister Jason Kenney, one of the promoters of the relic “to the victims of Communism” in Ottawa, recently visited Ukraine, where he speedy a military fight with Russia.

Curiously, Canadians of Chinese and Russian skirmish are absent from the Tribute to Liberty group, that is behind this project, even yet the numbers of “victims of Communism” in the People’s Republic of China and the largest inhabitant organisation in the Soviet Union were flawlessly aloft than in all the countries of Eastern Europe combined. This serve reinforces the impression that the monument’s idea is to target Russia.

The monument to “the victims of Communism” is also meant to discredit any left-leaning choice to triumphant neoliberalism. Elizabeth May of the Green Party has suggested that a monument be erected to the victims of capitalism (slavery, colonialism, exploitation, etc.), that according to some estimates, would ring some-more than billion people around the world. In Ottawa there is no relic to the victims of fascism and Nazism in Europe. Nor has Canada a memorial for the victims of its possess colonial wars, such as the one waged in South Africa at the spin of the 20th century.

According to a consult on the CBC news website, 88 percent of respondents were against to the monument. As matters now stand, the Royal Institute of Architects of Canada, Heritage Ottawa, former presidents of the Canadian Bar Association and others have objected to the project. The monument might never be built, quite if Harper loses the election on Oct. 19.

But Harper, a consistent ideologue and a unqualified politician, has already altered the image of Canada in the universe and is operative tough to change the way Canadians see their possess destiny and remember their past. This creates it easier to involve the nation in military adventures that have brought disharmony and death to thousands of victims of Canada’s new militarism in Asia and Africa. And he has been inexhaustible with Canadian lives as well: the Canadian Forces suffered, by 2010, the highest misadventure and fatality ratio among member states of the bloc fighting in Afghanistan.

He has now sent troops advisors to Ukraine. Harper has been loyal to a guarantee he reportedly done in 2006: “You won’t commend Canada when I’m by with it.” Indeed, many Canadians no longer commend possibly their possess nation or the redesigned history.

Yakov M. Rabkin has been highbrow of history at the University of Montreal given his flight from the Soviet Union in 1973. His many new book is “Comprendre l’État d’Israël.”

Article source: http://www.themoscowtimes.com/article/528853.html