Home / Spotlight / Czech Politician: West Will Have To ‘Crush’ Islam

Czech Politician: West Will Have To ‘Crush’ Islam

Islam is a “criminal” beliefs that deserves to be ranked with “Nazism, fascism and communism”, is “incompatible with a beliefs of European law” and, like a total predecessors, contingency fundamentally be defeated.

So argues Czech lawyer, romantic and politician Klára Samková in a tough attack harangue she delivered progressing this week in a Czech Parliament to an assembly including (some rather bemused) ambassadors from Muslim countries – including a Turkish envoy who, with several others, walked out half approach through.

Her debate – translated here by 

The law is an unique and inseparable partial of a Islamic ideology. It constitutes a core of a calm of Islam while a manners claimed to be eremite or reliable are usually delegate and extrinsic components of a ideology. From a outlook of Islam, a judgment of sacrament as a private, insinuate matter of an particular is positively unacceptable. However, that’s accurately a element on that today’s Christianity and a civilizations subsequent from it rely. It’s a private attribute of an particular towards God that is some-more or reduction mediated by one of a churches. Even those members of a civilization area who cruise themselves atheists, i.e. those who explain not to trust in God, automatically remove their attitudes to life from a Christian traditions while these traditions take a form of possibly folklore or informative automatisms that creates them share a generally supposed suggestion of Europe and both Americas. Again, it’s required to remind ourselves that this perspective is not usually unsuitable for Islam yet it is also denounced and categorically named as a crime. Islam rejects a particular source of faith in God and in a total way, it forbids all doubts about itself.

It is, she goes on, a faith complement formed on an intensely regressive, melancholic perspective of a world.

Islam doesn’t share a Enlightenment’s suspicion of a amicable swell compared with a future. According to Islam, a good times have already taken place – in a epoch of Prophet Mohammed. The best things that could have been finished have already been done, a best thing that could have been created has already been written, namely a Quran.

Rather than operative with a universe – as Judaism and Christianity, or during slightest a civilizations that have arisen from them do – Islam is filled with loathing for it.

Judaism, Christianity, and a civilization that arose from them have surpassed this unworthy skepticism, this disregard of people for themselves. At a same moment, Islam remained a stillborn tot of gnosis, misshapen into a monstrously deteriorated enterprise to mix with a Universe again, into a dense obsessively psychopathic neurotic prophesy about a well-developed inlet of one’s possess trail towards a reunification of a hint of one’s advocate with God.

Cruelly, this means that Muslims are not brought closer to yet serve divided from God.

This inadequate source also gives arise to a suspicion perspicacious all of Islam about a marker of matter with immorality and a disregard for a civilization that is counsel materialistic, and therefore alone immorality and discordant with God. It’s a genuine tragedy of a Muslims themselves that they have evermore sealed their tour to God by posterior this passed end.

Its prophesy of amiability is grave and riddled with self hatred.

Depression, perishing, a deficiency of faith in a tellurian and his irreplaceable value, doubt towards a grace of each tellurian being regardless of his characteristics such as religion, amicable status, sex, and nationality, that’s what characterizes Islam. Islam has deserted truth as we know it, as a probability of a vicious and receptive perspective into a inlet of reality.

Which substantially explains since Islam isn’t large on possibly tellurian rights – or systematic progress.

This opinion is also preventing Muslims from meditative about a questions on tellurian freedom, dignity, a purpose of a chairman and a state, and – paradoxically – also a questions about God that became, within a Euro-American civilization context, an fundamental member of a schemes of suspicion followed by tip scientists – astrophysicists, mathematicians, biologists, who are touching a unequivocally foundations of a Universe and therefore a hint of God by their research. However, Muslims are perpetually banned to benefit any approach hit with God that they mislaid during a impulse of Prophet Mohammed’s death. How immensely unfortunate their life contingency be when it’s radically usually a watchful for death.

Unfortunately, Islam doesn’t wish to be miserable on a own. It wants to take a rest of a universe down with it.

Islam doesn’t honour development, progress, and humanity. In a despair, it is attempting to take a rest of a humankind with it since from a Islamic viewpoint, a rest of a universe is futile, useless, and unclean.

This doesn’t make for a quite cosy attribute with Western magnanimous democracy. But many politicians and lawmakers, not slightest in a European Union, are in rejection about this.

Islam and a Sharia law is exclusive with a beliefs of a European law, generally with a rights enumerated in a 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (and Freedoms). How is it probable that a law experts don’t see this conflict? How is probable that they sojourn silent?

Muslims have got unequivocally good during exploiting what they understand as debility in a West’s magnanimous values.

Islam likes to censor behind a eremite facade [for] its permanent, deliberate, and eloquent abuse of a Euro-American authorised complement and values that a civilizations built on a Judeo-Christian foundations have converged to. There’s zero improved or some-more fit than to abuse a value complement of one’s enemy, generally when we don’t share that system. And that’s accurately how Islam behaves. It wants to be stable according to a tradition that it exploits in this way, while it is not pacific to act reciprocally. It relies on a traditions, it claims that a traditions are important, while behind a scenes, it is shouting during us and a complement of values.

In Europe, they justify their final on a drift that Article 9 of a European Convention on Human Rights guarantees them leisure of thinking, conscience, and eremite faith. But what they – and many lawyers – don’t conclude as that this Article is subordinate to a one introduced by Winston Churchill, precisely in sequence to stop a Convention being refused by total ideologies.

Nothing in this Convention might be interpreted as implying for any State, organisation or chairman any right to rivet in any activity or perform any act directed during a drop of any of a rights and freedoms set onward herein or during their reduction to a larger border than is supposing for in a Convention.

This essay was introduced to a Convention by Winston Churchill privately who did it for a special reason, namely as a insurance opposite a total regimes. He was apparently meditative of a applicable ones of that time, a comrade regimes. we have Islam in mind that is equally total and melancholy as a regimes that Winston Churchill was fighting opposite and that he defeated. The insurance by Article 17 rightly relates opposite any beliefs and a fact that a European countries compelled by a Convention motionless not to make a essay so distant doesn’t meant that they don’t have a will to do so. These countries are usually too kind and benevolent, too wakeful of a cost they have paid while training about a top value of a humanity, and too patient.

So distant Islam might have finished all a running. But it has reckoned yet one thing: notwithstanding a West’s apparent weakness, a knowledge of World War II in fact finished it tough as nails.

The arrogance of a Muslim countries and leaders who have motionless to scare Europeans by their bargain of a universe that a means of Europe’s loitering is a weakness, is wholly flawed. Europe has been concentration to a opinion and to a universe perspective for a cost of tens of millions of tellurian casualties, it has paid by pang that no Muslim can even imagine.

This will eventually come to a conduct – and it won’t be pretty.

For some time, Europe will keep on seeking this doubt about a pacific co-existence. At some moment, a doubt will bear a shift and it will sound unequivocally differently. It will no longer be DO YOU WANT TO LIVE WITH US yet DO YOU WANT TO LIVE? Do you, a Muslims, wish to survive? Because if a devotees of Islam won’t wish to live in peace, Europe and America will do what it has finished twice when they were threatened by ideologies aggressive a hint of a humanity: it will salary a fight and vanquish a enemy.

So it’s in Muslims’ possess interests not to go any serve down this route.

I am regulating this entertainment and call on all Muslims and all countries that explain that Islam is their religion: Stop it. You are on a wrong track. You are on a lane that leads divided from God. You are on a highway of a murderers. Your genocide won’t get we to Barbelá, to a land of a non-creator God, yet to a land of extinction and indistinguishable uselessness. Nothing will be left out of we and a name of your purported sacrament will usually be conspicuous when people separate out spit that was churned with a dirt from a highway of a successful, happy, and dear by God people.

Klára Samková delivered this debate during a discussion called “Should we be fearful of Islam” organized by a lawmaker in ANO (the billionaire Babiš’s populist centrist party), Zdeněk Soukup. It took place in a Czech council and guest enclosed a ambassadors of Turkey, Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

Samková, yet an outspoken radical, is unequivocally not on a far-right. On a contrary, she’s an romantic best famous for her counterclaim of a a generally unpopular minority organisation in a Czech Republic – a Roma – and is widely counsel to be a Social Justice Warrior. In a past she has also collaborated with a Union of Czech Muslims – yet not so many after this speech.

According to Motl:

The debate was generally applauded by roughly all Czech commenters during Internet newspapers of all domestic colors. But she’s not unequivocally exceptional, if we get a logic. It’s a debate that she gave, it was tough and arrange of easily constructed. But a underlying ideas are positively generically supposed by a Czech society. So she’s been praised to be dauntless etc. yet what she pronounced simply isn’t banned in a society.

Our supervision is ambiguous, in between Orban and a EU,  but a Czech open is substantially generally some-more antagonistic towards a Islamic immigration than a publics of other Visegrad (let alone other EU) countries. So she doesn’t turn superfamous or a domestic luminary by such a debate notwithstanding a widespread agreement simply since she doesn’t amply differ from other Czechs and she might be counsel one-dimensional with these interests.

Perhaps a debate will be perceived differently elsewhere in a world. But according to Motl, there are reasons since in Czech Republic a position on Islam will not be counsel quite controversial.

There are several reasons since Czechs are generally some-more anti-Islamic-immigration than anyone else etc. It’s tough to communicate all a correlations and some of them are speculative. But we have a comrade knowledge that finished us defence opposite some inexpensive promotion about a amicable engineering projects and flushed destiny they will make. Second, in 1938, we were tricked by a Munich Treaty – this is an denote that a Western capitals infrequently wish to confirm about a matters yet us. So this is identical – instead of a Germans who could widespread in all of Europe yet stipulations in a late 1930s, now it’s a Arabs, and it’s motionless in a Western European capitals again.

Then Czechs are atheists and from many perspectives, that places them even serve detached from Muslims than Christians are from Muslims, if we get this point. And there are other things. It doesn’t meant that people are irrationally antagonistic in some way. They’re usually reasonable. The nation indeed has had a prolonged and successful tradition of trade with countless countries in a Muslim world, tons of weapons trade with Syria – Assad’s father etc., Libya, and so on, and so on, yet also tends to be among a many undeniable allies of Israel. After some Cameron OK, we could sell some 15 aeroplane fighters to Iraq, L-159, recently, that should be now used opposite Daesh. So things indeed work yet it’s a accord that we shouldn’t let too many of these visitors to come in and reshape a country. Things are OK adequate when removed during opposite continents.

In a Parliament, KDU-CSL – a Czech “CDU” – is a many German-like party, with opinions maybe concordant with Merkel’s nonetheless certainly not so many pro-welcoming. It’s a smallest celebration in a bloc now. TOP-09, once a partial of KDU, is a categorical celebration of a antithesis that has (weaker) tendencies to support a Brussels policies (but certainly not as strongly as Brussels would like). The rest  of politics is fundamentally in accord that a mass immigration shouldn’t be allowed. Some 98% of Czechs contend no, over 90% contend no even to proxy hosting of genuine refugees from fight zones, etc. The atmosphere unequivocally is opposite even than in England.

Article source: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/21/czech-politician-islam-is-incompatible-with-western-civilization/