Home / Ukraine / Deadly Explosions Raise Questions over Russian Mining Safety

Deadly Explosions Raise Questions over Russian Mining Safety

Sergei (not his genuine name) was some-more than 700 meters subterraneous when the blast came. The next thing he knew, he was fibbing on the ground, drunken and disorientated: “You couldn’t see a thing, it was prohibited and it was apropos unfit to breathe.”

In the dark, Sergei fumbled around for a rail, and began crawling towards the exit. “I didn’t feel clever adequate to make it, to be honest, though we motionless to crawl until the end,” he told The Moscow Times.

Sergei was eventually discovered from the stricken Severnaya cave in Vorkuta, a city over the Arctic Circle in Russia’s Far North, on the night of Feb. 27. He emerged from the belligerent shortly after the third explosion.

A few hours later, authorities strictly stopped the rescue operation. None of the 26 miners left subterraneous could have survived the third blast, they argued. Given that 5 rescuers had already died in the march of the operation, it was simply forward to continue.

Three days after the first explosion, 36 people were strictly announced dead.

Although the investigation is still ongoing, officials have already uttered their chronicle of what happened. Several days after the tragedy, Alexei Alyoshin, conduct of the attention watchdog Rostekhnadzor, reported to President Vladimir Putin that an “anomaly” in the spark covering was to blame. It caused an abrupt spike of methane levels and this led to explosions, he said.

Before the tragedy, pronounced Alyoshin, the situation in the cave was underneath control: It was constantly inspected, mining never stopped since “there was no risk for the workers,” and detectors customarily showed “methane levels were next average.”

At the same time, miners and their families have claimed that managers contingency have been wakeful of the risk of a gas explosion. For more than 3 weeks before to the accident, miners had uttered concerns over the level of methane thoroughness being high adequate to cause an explosion.

“Every day my father came home from work and told me there was too most gas,” Viktoria Prasolova, the widow of miner Roman Tila, who was killed in the Vorkuta mine, said. “They were operative on the corner of life and death.”

Nobody Likes a Quitter

Natalya Tryasukho, who also mislaid her associate in the accident, pronounced her father had a portable gas turn analyzer, and it “went off all the time,” display additional levels of methane. She told The Moscow Times that her father and his colleagues had complained to management, though to no avail. “‘If you’re not happy with something, quit,’ they were told,” she said.

Despite the concerns and obvious dangers, quitting was not a real choice for most of the group underground. In Vorkuta, mining is the only pursuit that guarantees a decent income. “A lot of people are observant now that the miners were wakeful of the risks and endangered themselves knowingly. But what are the options? We’ve got kids to raise,” the widow said.

The Moscow Times asked Vorkutaugol, the company that owns the mine, to provide sum on the approach it dealt with complaints. The company did not respond directly to the question, though pronounced that “systems had not rescued high levels of methane in the mine” before to the tragedy. These systems automatically close down mining apparatus if gas thoroughness exceeds available levels, the company orator said. “Today no one can force miners to work if there are risks,” Vorkutaugol’s technical executive Denis Paikin added.

Miners in Vorkuta had been notifying government about additional methane levels before the explosions — to no avail.

However, association reserve systems infrequently destroy to pick adult on high methane levels. “Such complement detectors can be located in a place where the ventilation is better — hence reduce gas levels,” says Alexander Sergeyev, chair of the Independent Mining Union and a former miner himself. “The thoroughness of methane is significantly aloft in the segments where workers cave the coal — that’s because their unstable detectors showed higher, and more worrying counts.”

After a similar tragedy in a Siberian cave in 2010, that killed 91 people, authorities upheld a law requiring the degassing of coking spark mines. In theory, this should have separated the problem of excess methane in the mines, says Sergeyev. But stream protocols on degassing concede cave government to degas usually in certain cases, and, even when implemented, there is no pledge that it will be finished properly. “The categorical doubt is how effective degassing was,” Sergeyev said.

The Price of Life

The Vorkuta collision was distant from Russia’s first. Over the past dual decades, methane explosions have happened each 3 years on average, claiming dozens of lives. Investigations mostly exhibit that mining continued notwithstanding concerns over towering methane levels. In some cases, miners were forced to continue to mine; in other cases they were encouraged by concerns over salary, that depended on the volume of coal they mined.

That said, Sergeyev believes a great understanding has softened in the final 6 years. Fines for violating reserve manners have been increased; new technologies have been implemented. “Still, tragedies like this one uncover that we still have work to do,” he said.

In the meantime, the families of miners killed in Vorkuta weep their losses. Government officials have betrothed to pay remuneration of up to 5 million rubles ($67,500) to each bereaved family. But the mining village of Vorkuta fears that no one will indeed be hold accountable for what happened.

“In 2013 an explosion in another Vorkuta cave resulted in deaths, too. But the man obliged for safety wasn’t charged — they only eliminated him to work on our mine,” Sergei told The Moscow Times. “Once the media charge around the accident dies down, we will expected be thrown underneath the bus.”

Article source: http://www.themoscowtimes.com/article/561299.html