Home / Spotlight / Democratic Blues

Democratic Blues

As historians start to cruise Barack Obama’s record as president, there’s during slightest one bequest he’ll leave that will indeed be historic—but not in a approach he would have hoped. Even as Democrats demeanour agreeably forward to a presidential landscape of 2016, a strength in a Electoral College belies outrageous waste opposite many of a country. In fact, no boss in complicated times has presided over so catastrophic a widen for his party, during roughly each spin of politics.

Follow Us

Get POLITICO Magazine in your feeds

Legacies are mostly tough to measure. If we wish to see usually how wily they can be, cruise a discuss to get Andrew Jackson off a $20 check 178 years after he left a White House. Working category hero? How about worker owners and champion of Native American genocide? Or watch how JFK went from dear sufferer to a male whose majestic overreach entrapped us in Vietnam, and afterwards behind to a boss whose anticipation kept a Cuban Missile Crisis from branch into World War III.

Yet when we pierce from routine to politics, a charge is a lot simpler—just magnitude a poke of a president’s celebration when he took bureau and when he left it. By that measure, Obama’s 6 years have been terrible.

Under Obama, a celebration started strong. “When Obama was inaugurated in 2008, Democrats were during a high H2O mark,” says David Axelrod, who served as one of Obama’s tip strategists. “Driven by opposition to George W. Bush and afterwards a Obama wave, Democrats had enjoyed dual ensign elections in ’06 and ’08. We won dozens of extraordinary congressional elections in states and districts that routinely would hook Republican, and that outcome trickled down to other offices. You supplement to that a fact that we would take bureau in a midst of a set-back retrogression given a Great Depression, and it was apparent, from Day One, that we had nowhere to go nonetheless down.”

The initial signs of a solemnly maturation disturbance that has meant a decimation of a Democratic Party nationally began early—with a special choosing of Scott Brown to Ted Kennedy’s dull Senate chair in Massachusetts. That early loss, even nonetheless a chair was won behind eventually by Elizabeth Warren, presaged a 2010 midterms, that saw a detriment of 63 House and 6 Senate seats. It was disaster that came as no warn to a White House, nonetheless also valid a vigilance of what was to come.

The party’s record over a past 6 years has done transparent that when Barack Obama leaves bureau in Jan 2017 a Democratic Party will have ceded immeasurable sections of a republic to Republicans, and will be left with a diseased dais of high-level inaugurated officials. It is, in fact, so dour a record that even if a Democrats reason a White House and retake a Senate in 2016, a party’s wounds will sojourn low and enduring, melancholy a dramatization of anything like a “progressive” bulletin opposite many of a republic and expelling scarcely a decade’s value of rising stars who competence assistance strengthen a celebration in elections ahead.

When Obama came into a White House, it seemed like a Democrats had incited a dilemma generationally; during usually 47, he was one of a youngest group to be inaugurated as president. But a celebration has struggled to build a new era of leaders around him. Eight years later, when he leaves bureau in 2017 during 55, he’ll indeed be one of a party’s usually leaders not authorised for Social Security. Even as a celebration has recently prisoner some-more immature electorate during a list box in presidential elections, a leaders are increasingly of an wholly opposite generation; many of a party’s leaders will blur from a inhabitant stage in a years ahead. Its dual heading presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are 67 and 73. The sitting clamp president, Joe Biden, is 72. The Democratic House leader, Nancy Pelosi, is 75; House Whip Steny Hoyer is 76 and congress Chair James Clyburn is 75, as is Harry Reid, a Senate Democratic leader, who will retire subsequent year. It’s a celebration that will be branch to a new era of leaders in a entrance years—and yet, there are changed few looking around a nation’s state houses, U.S. House or Senate seats.


Barack Obama took office in 2009 with 60 Democrats in a Senate—counting dual independents who caucused with a party—and 257 House members. Today, there are 46 members of a Senate Democratic caucus, a set-back display given a initial year after a Reagan landslide. Across a Capitol, there are 188 Democrats in a House, giving Republicans their best display given Herbert Hoover took a White House in 1929.

This is, however, a tip of a iceberg. When we demeanour during a states, a fall of a party’s fortunes are worse. Republicans now reason 31 governorships, 9 some-more than they reason when Obama was inaugurated. During a final 6 years a GOP has won governorships in purple and even low blue states: Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Maryland, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, New Mexico, Nevada, Ohio. In a final midterms, usually one involved Republican governor—Tom Corbett in Pennsylvania—was transposed by a Democrat. (Sean Parnell in Alaska mislaid to an independent.) Every other involved Republican returned to office.

Now spin to state legislatures—although if you’re a constant Democrat, we might wish to avert your eyes. In 2009, Democrats were in full control of 27 state legislatures; Republicans reason full energy in 14. Now? The GOP is in full control of 30 state legislatures; Democrats reason full energy in usually 11. In 24 states, Republicans control a governorship and both houses of a legislature—giving them sum control over a domestic process. That increasing energy during a state spin has already led to critical consequences for Democrats, for their domestic destiny and for their goals.

“It’s roughly a crime,” Democratic Party Vice Chair Donna Brazile says. “We have been positively decimated during a state and internal level.”

Taken as a whole, these 6 years have been roughly historically awful for Democrats. You have to go behind to a Great Depression and a Watergate years to find so thespian a annulment of fortunes for a party. And this time, there’s conjunction a Great Depression nor a rapist swindling in a White House to explain what has happened.

Some of a party’s inhabitant erosion might good have been inevitable. The mutation of a South from a one-party Democratic segment to a (virtual) one-party Republican segment accounts for some of a waste to a Democratic ranks. That 2010 choosing gave Republicans in 9 states control over redistricting, that gave them some-more seats in a U.S. House and state legislatures 4 years later. And a thespian fallout in support from white working-class electorate can be explained, in some progressives’ eyes, by a disaster to residence a predicament of what was once a party’s base.

“These voters,” pollster Stan Greenberg wrote recently in a Washington Monthly, “are open to an expanded Democratic mercantile agenda—to some-more advantages for child caring and aloft education, to taxation hikes on a wealthy, to investment in infrastructure spending, and to mercantile policies that lead employers to boost salaries for middle- and working-class Americans, generally women. Yet they are usually prepared to listen when they consider that Democrats know their deeply reason faith that politics has been depraved and supervision has failed. Championing remodel of supervision and a domestic routine is a cost of acknowledgment with these voters.”

Whatever a explanations, there is an unsettling existence for Democrats: While they might comfortable themselves over presidential prospects—demographic shifts and a Republican Party deeply during fight with itself and consumed by a pell-mell primary highlighted by a discuss progressing this month, starring Donald Trump during a core of a stage—the continue where so many of a politics and policies will be made looks clearly chiller.

“We are rowdiness ourselves,” says one well-placed Democratic operative, “if we consider we can allege a on-going bulletin in Washington, if half a Congress and half a states are tranquil by a Republican Party enthusiastically operative to remove each snippet of on-going policy.”


In confronting midterms headwinds, each two-term boss has had to reckon with his party’s misfortune. The “six-year itch,” when electorate retaliate a president’s celebration with congressional losses, has cheerless each boss given Theodore Roosevelt with usually one exception: Bill Clinton in 1998. In Clinton’s case, though, electorate had dealt Democrats a abrasive midterm detriment 4 years earlier, capturing a Senate and—for a initial time in 40 years—the House of Representatives as well. And given 1928, usually one president—Ronald Reagan—has managed to leave a White House in a hands of an inaugurated inheritor of a same party.

This chronological record, however, offers small comfort to today’s Democrats or to Obama’s down-ballot legacy. No two-term boss in new times has seen his celebration clobbered in both midterm elections. In one case—the 1986 midterms—Reagan’s Republican Party did comparatively good in a House, losing usually 5 seats. But it mislaid a Senate when 7 GOP seats incited over, some by really slight margins. Democrats gained 5 House seats in 1998, even nonetheless their boss was in a center of a vital scandal. And while usually Reagan saw his celebration reason a White House, 3 other presidents—Eisenhower, Johnson, Clinton—all saw their party’s hopeful come within a hair of victory. Not usually did Gore win a renouned vote, nonetheless Democrats in 2000 picked adult 5 Senate seats.

Wait, we are asking: Don’t Democrats, with a demographic breeze during their backs, have a good possibility of holding a White House? Doesn’t a Senate map give them a genuine shot during retaking a Senate? Don’t inhabitant polls uncover that a GOP is distant some-more unpopular than a Democratic Party?

Yes—and a third tenure for Democrats along with a recaptured Senate would clearly impact Obama’s domestic legacy. Even with those victories, however, a afflictions of Democrats during each other spin would safeguard fast domestic trouble.

Jeff Greenfield is a five-time Emmy-winning network radio researcher and author.

Article source: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/democratic-blues-121561.html