What We’re Reading
He Said, She Said: Rachel Mitchell, a outward prosecutor hired by Republicans to doubt Christine Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh final week, expelled a memo explaining why she wouldn’t move rapist charges opposite him. (Seung Min Kim, The Washington Post)
‘Brett Kavanaugh Is Lying’: When deliberation a testimonies of Kavanaugh and Ford, it’s unfit to shun that conclusion, argues Nathan J. Robinson. Here’s why. (Current Affairs)
Dogged by a Past?: Former Vice President Joe Biden is exploring a 2020 presidential run. But his purpose in a 1991 Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill hearings could reason him back. (Alexander Burns and Jonathan Martin, The New York Times)
‘Devin Nunes Has a Secret’: Reporter Ryan Lizza trafficked to northwest Iowa to find out because Nunes’s family sole their plantation and changed out of state. Things got weird. (Esquire)
Who, What, Where?: There are three points of inconsistency between Ford’s and Kavanaugh’s testimonies that an FBI review competence be means to transparent up. (Karen Yourish and Troy Griggs, The New York Times)
We wish to hear what we consider about this article. Submit a letter to a editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.