Home / Ukraine / The People vs. Nadezhda Savchenko: Highlights of a Notorious Case

The People vs. Nadezhda Savchenko: Highlights of a Notorious Case

The Donetsk metropolitan justice in southern Russia has begun a sentencing of Ukrainian troops commander Nadezhda Savchenko, who has been on hearing on charges of aiding a murdering of dual Russian journalists. The Moscow Times reviews a highlights of one of a many scandalous cases of a final dual years.


• On Jun 17, Russian reporters Igor Kornelyuk and Anton Voloshin of a VGTRK state-run media holding are killed in Luhansk, Ukraine.

• On Jun 23, a 33-year-old Ukrainian commander Nadezhda Savchenko is incarcerated on Russian dirt after “illegally crossing” into Russia, according to Russian investigators.

• On Jul 9, Investigative Committee orator Vladimir Markin announces that Savchenko was charged with “abetting in killing” a journalists.

• Ukrainian officials say that Savchenko was restrained by separatists in Luhansk, energetic opposite a limit opposite her will and afterwards handed over to Russian comprehension officers. In July, a Ukrainian Foreign Ministry issues a matter that says: “Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry expresses a sure criticism opposite a bootleg trafficking of Nadezhda Savchenko to Russia.”

• The U.S. Embassy in Moscow calls for Savchenko’s evident release, condemning “kidnapping by separatists, her bootleg send to Russian authorities and her enlarged detention.”

• In September, Savchenko is eliminated to Moscow for a debate psychiatric assessment.

• In October, Savchenko is inaugurated to a Ukrainian council in absentia. She heads a list of Yuliya Timoshenko’s Batkivshina party.

• In November, Savchenko is announced lucid and eliminated behind to pre-trial detention.

• On Dec. 15, Savchenko declares a craving strike, after being refused medical diagnosis in a pre-trial apprehension center.


• In January, another rapist box is launched opposite Savchenko,, formed on a accusations of her illegally channel a Russian border.

• At a same time, Savchenko wins a chair in a Ukrainian commission of a Parliamentary Assembly of a Council of Europe (PACE).

• In Feb — in an speak to a OpenRussia website — Savchenko says she is prepared to “go until a end.” She also announces she would cruise force-feeding torture, and that she is prepared to die as a outcome of her craving strike.

• In February, Russian opposition-leaning Novaya Gazeta journal collects 11,500 signatures underneath a petition to Russian President Vladimir Putin, propelling him to recover Savchenko from prison, with dozens of distinguished tellurian rights advocates, reporters and artists among signatories. It is followed by a Presidential Human Rights Council job on a Investigative Committee and a Prosecutor General’s Office to recover Savchenko — to no result.

• Meanwhile, a U.S. State Department mouthpiece Jennifer Psaki and a UN high commissioner on tellurian rights Rupert Colville call on Russian authorities to recover Savchenko — also to no avail.

• Savchenko continues her craving strike until March, when her health declines significantly and a organisation of Ukrainian doctors suggest her adopt a special reconstruction diet.

• In May, PACE claims Savchenko’s membership in a classification provides her with shield from prosecution. The justice in Moscow refutes a claim, citing her initial apprehension occurring before she became a PACE delegate. The Moscow justice also dismisses a defense’s censure per investigators’ refusal to concede Savchenko to attend PACE sessions.

• In September, a hearing of Savchenko’s box starts in Donetsk — a tiny southern Russian city that shares a name with a categorical insurgent building eastern Ukraine. Savchenko denies a charges, revelation a justice “I am a soldier, not a murderer.” Her invulnerability group argues that she was innocent, presenting justification that she was restrained before a conflict on a reporters occurred; therefore, she could not have conducted it.

• Russian Justice Ministry announces a probability of Savchenko’s extradition after a sentencing in October. Later in a year, other Russian officials speak about a probability of a restrained exchange, though no decisions are made.

• In December, Investigative Committee orator Vladimir Markin says Savchenko competence accept a “tough” sentence.


• The hearing concludes in March. The charge ask a justice to crook Savchenko for 23 years in prison, with a 100,000 ruble fine. Savchenko’s invulnerability insists on her ignorance in their shutting arguments.

• On Mar 3, Savchenko declares a dry craving strike after a justice postpones her final matter to Mar 9. The content of her matter is posted online by her sister Vera and goes viral.

• After her final matter is review on Mar 9, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko says he would be prepared to use his inherent rights to approve Savchenko’s inclusion in a restrained exchange. He adds that there has been no such offer from a Russian side.

• On Mar 10, entering a sixth day of a craving strike, Savchenko agrees to start celebration H2O and holding vitamin supplements after receiving a minute from Poroshenko. The minute turns out to be a feign sent by pro-Kremlin Russian pranksters Vovan and Lexus.

• On Mar 21, a justice starts reading a verdict. According to news reports, it will take dual days to broach it in full. In Dec final year Savchenko pronounced she would not interest a sentence, no matter how harsh.

• Chair of a Presidential Human Rights Council Mikhail Fedotov pronounced on Mar 21 that restrained sell will usually be probable after a judgment comes into force. He combined that if a charge appeals a sentence, sell could be behind tentative a appeal.

Article source: http://www.themoscowtimes.com/article/563095.html